REVIEWER GUIDELINES

Peer review is an essential process that ensures the quality, credibility, and integrity of the research published in the EduTechy International Journal of Science, Art and Humanities (EIJSAH). The journal highly values the time, effort, and expertise of reviewers who voluntarily contribute to improving the quality of submitted manuscripts.

The primary responsibility of reviewers is to critically evaluate the scientific quality, originality, and relevance of the submitted manuscript while providing fair, constructive, and unbiased feedback to the authors. Reviewers are encouraged to offer detailed, respectful, and professional comments that help authors enhance the overall clarity, rigor, and impact of their work.

EduTechy International Journal of Science, Art and Humanities (EIJSAH) identifies reviewers through various sources, including its editorial board members, scholarly databases, professional networks, and author recommendations. Reviewers’ assessments play a crucial role in the editorial decision-making process regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

  • Conduct the review fairly, objectively, and confidentially.
  • Avoid personal criticism and focus feedback on the scientific merit of the work.
  • Maintain complete anonymity throughout the double-blind review process.
  • Decline the review invitation if a conflict of interest exists or if unable to complete the review within the requested timeframe.
  • Respect the confidentiality of the manuscript and refrain from sharing or discussing it with others.
  • Provide a detailed evaluation using the reviewer form provided by the journal.
  • Communicate any ethical concerns, plagiarism, or data manipulation suspicions directly to the Editor-in-Chief.

Points to Consider During Review

  • Is the topic of the manuscript relevant and significant to the journal’s scope?
  • Does the paper follow the author guidelines and maintain academic standards?
  • Are the title, abstract, and keywords clear and appropriate?
  • Is the manuscript well-written, logically structured, and free from major grammatical or formatting errors?
  • Are the objectives clearly defined, and are the methods appropriate and ethical?
  • Are the results valid, well-presented, and statistically analyzed?
  • Are the conclusions supported by the data and discussion?
  • Are figures, tables, and references accurate, complete, and properly cited in the journal’s format?
  • Is there any indication of plagiarism, data manipulation, or bias?

Ethical Considerations

Reviewers must uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct in the peer-review process. They should follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for peer reviewers, ensuring that the review remains confidential, respectful, and unbiased.

For reference, reviewers are encouraged to consult the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers for detailed recommendations and best practices.